DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated May 14, 2026 from live stats

Anthony Richardson vs Cam Ward

Fantasy Football Comparison for the 2026 NFL Season

The Bottom Line

Anthony Richardson is the better fantasy play this season.

The gap here is significant. Anthony Richardson outscored Cam Ward by 8.5 PPG in 2025 with 25 total touchdowns. If both are on your board, Anthony Richardson is the clear pick. Cam Ward profiles as a matchup-dependent quarterback who can spike but lacks the consistent floor.

High confidence: stats strongly favor the leader, and the gap is unlikely to close on matchup alone.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

The DraftCall app pushes alerts the moment Anthony Richardson or Cam Ward's status changes. Free.

Get the App
QBIndianapolis Colts#99PPG LEADER
Anthony Richardson
PPG
19.5
Games
13
Pass Yds
2,718
Pass TDs
18
Rush Yds
580
Rush TDs
7
Bye
Week 14
QBTennessee Titans#39
Cam Ward
PPG
11.0
Games
17
Pass Yds
3,169
Pass TDs
15
Rush Yds
159
Rush TDs
2
Bye
Week 10

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Anthony Richardson
Cam Ward

Head to Head

19.5 PPG11.0 PPG
13 GP17 GP
Bye: Week 14Bye: Week 10

Fantasy Tiers

Anthony Richardson: Tier 5 (Deep League) QB (ranked #99 at the position). Cam Ward: Tier 5 (Deep League) QB (ranked #39 at the position). Among the top 32 quarterbacks this season, Anthony Richardson is producing at 89% of elite pace and Cam Ward at 50%. That ranking gap means Cam Ward carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Anthony Richardson vs Cam Ward: Who Should You Start?

Anthony Richardson and Cam Ward are at different tiers heading into 2026. The Indianapolis Colts quarterback averaged 19.5 PPG in 2025, a full 8.5 points per game ahead of Cam Ward's 11.0 with the Tennessee Titans. That kind of gap doesn't close on matchup alone.

The per-game difference of 8.5 points favors Anthony Richardson, though savvy managers know that gap can shrink or widen depending on the weekly slate. Defensive matchup, recent scoring trends, and health status all shift the calculus from one quarterback to the other.

Anthony Richardson offers meaningful rushing upside with 580 yards on the ground in 2025, which separates his floor from a pocket passer like Cam Ward (3169 passing yards, 15 touchdowns). In games where the passing matchup looks ugly, that rushing production can be the entire difference on a start/sit call.

Anthony Richardson has his bye in Week 14, and Cam Ward rests in Week 10. Managers rostering both need waiver wire depth at quarterback for those two weeks, and that is exactly the kind of planning DraftCall's matchup engine surfaces automatically so you are not scrambling on a Sunday morning.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Anthony Richardson is a buy in trades where the other manager is chasing upside at a different position. Cam Ward is a hold unless you can flip him for a positional upgrade elsewhere on your roster. Dynasty outlook: Anthony Richardson (age 27) is in his prime window. Peak production now with steady value for the next 3-4 seasons. Cam Ward (age 23) is in the early stages of his career with 5+ years of starter-caliber upside. His dynasty value is rising.

Did You Know?

  • Anthony Richardson outscored Cam Ward by a projected 145 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Cam Ward played 17 games in 2025 compared to Anthony Richardson's 13. That durability gap means Cam Ward contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Anthony Richardson scored 25 total touchdowns in 2025 (1.9 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at quarterback.
  • Anthony Richardson added 580 rushing yards in 2025, which historically correlates with a higher fantasy floor in bad passing matchups.
Detailed Stat Breakdown
StatRichardsonWard
PPG (Half-PPR)19.511.0
Games Played1317
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)254187
Passing Yards2,7183,169
Passing TDs1815
Pass Yds/Game209.1186.4
Rushing Yards580159
Rushing TDs72
Total TDs2517
TDs/Game1.91.0
Age-23
Bye WeekWeek 14Week 10

Summary

19.5 PPG for Anthony Richardson versus 11.0 for Cam Ward in 2025. The baseline favors Anthony Richardson, though the right weekly matchup can flip the script. For a full breakdown that weighs matchup quality, form, and injury reports, try DraftCall's AI comparison engine.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Anthony Richardson vs Cam Ward

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Anthony Richardson or Cam Ward in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Anthony Richardson has the edge at 19.5 PPG compared to Cam Ward's 11.0 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Anthony Richardson and Cam Ward average in 2025?

Anthony Richardson averaged 19.5 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 13 games in 2025. Cam Ward averaged 11.0 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 8.5 points per game.

When are Anthony Richardson and Cam Ward's bye weeks in 2026?

Anthony Richardson (IND) has a bye in Week 14, and Cam Ward (TEN) has a bye in Week 10. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Anthony Richardson or Cam Ward a better fantasy quarterback in 2026?

Anthony Richardson outscored Cam Ward by 8.5 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.