DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated May 14, 2026 from live stats

Mac Jones vs Matthew Stafford

Fantasy Football Comparison for the 2026 NFL Season

The Bottom Line

Matthew Stafford is the better fantasy play this season.

The gap here is significant. Matthew Stafford outscored Mac Jones by 8.8 PPG in 2025 with 46 total touchdowns. If both are on your board, Matthew Stafford is the clear pick. Mac Jones profiles as a matchup-dependent quarterback who can spike but lacks the consistent floor.

High confidence: stats strongly favor the leader, and the gap is unlikely to close on matchup alone.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

The DraftCall app pushes alerts the moment Mac Jones or Matthew Stafford's status changes. Free.

Get the App
QBSan Francisco 49ers#33
Mac Jones
PPG
11.8
Games
11
Pass Yds
2,151
Pass TDs
13
Bye
Week 14
QBLos Angeles Rams#3PPG LEADER
Matthew Stafford
PPG
20.6
Games
17
Pass Yds
4,707
Pass TDs
46
Bye
Week 8

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Mac Jones
Matthew Stafford

Head to Head

11.8 PPG20.6 PPG
11 GP17 GP
Bye: Week 14Bye: Week 8

Fantasy Tiers

Mac Jones: Tier 4 (Bench/Bye Fill) QB (ranked #33 at the position). Matthew Stafford: Tier 1 (Elite) QB (ranked #3 at the position). Among the top 32 quarterbacks this season, Mac Jones is producing at 54% of elite pace and Matthew Stafford at 94%. That ranking gap means Matthew Stafford carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Mac Jones vs Matthew Stafford: Who Should You Start?

Matthew Stafford and Mac Jones are at different tiers heading into 2026. The Los Angeles Rams quarterback averaged 20.6 PPG in 2025, a full 8.8 points per game ahead of Mac Jones's 11.8 with the San Francisco 49ers. That kind of gap doesn't close on matchup alone.

That 8.8-point weekly advantage for Matthew Stafford is meaningful but not automatic. Fantasy football is a week-to-week sport, and the answer to "who should I start" often changes based on opponent, recent form, and game environment. Season averages set the baseline; weekly context makes the call.

Both lean on arm talent and offensive scheme as traditional pocket passers. Mac Jones threw for 2151 yards and 13 touchdowns, while Matthew Stafford posted 4707 yards and 46 scores. Volume, red zone efficiency, and game script are the key week-to-week differentiators when neither carries rushing upside.

Mac Jones has his bye in Week 14, and Matthew Stafford rests in Week 8. Managers rostering both need waiver wire depth at quarterback for those two weeks, and that is exactly the kind of planning DraftCall's matchup engine surfaces automatically so you are not scrambling on a Sunday morning.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Matthew Stafford is a buy in trades where the other manager is chasing upside at a different position. Mac Jones is a hold unless you can flip him for a positional upgrade elsewhere on your roster. Dynasty outlook: Mac Jones (age 27) is in his prime window. Peak production now with steady value for the next 3-4 seasons. Matthew Stafford (age 38) is on the back end of his prime. Strong now, but dynasty value declines year over year.

Did You Know?

  • Matthew Stafford outscored Mac Jones by a projected 150 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Matthew Stafford played 17 games in 2025 compared to Mac Jones's 11. That durability gap means Matthew Stafford contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Matthew Stafford scored 46 total touchdowns in 2025 (2.7 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at quarterback.
  • Mac Jones is 11 years younger than Matthew Stafford (27 vs 38), which significantly impacts dynasty league trade value.
Detailed Stat Breakdown
StatJonesStafford
PPG (Half-PPR)11.820.6
Games Played1117
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)130350
Passing Yards2,1514,707
Passing TDs1346
Pass Yds/Game195.5276.9
Rushing Yards601
Rushing TDs00
Total TDs1346
TDs/Game1.22.7
Age2738
Experience4 yrs16 yrs
Bye WeekWeek 14Week 8

Summary

The 2025 numbers favor Matthew Stafford at 20.6 PPG, 8.8 points per game above Mac Jones's 11.8. But season stats only tell part of the story. DraftCall's AI factors in weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status to give you a verdict that updates with the latest data.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Mac Jones vs Matthew Stafford

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Mac Jones or Matthew Stafford in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Matthew Stafford has the edge at 20.6 PPG compared to Mac Jones's 11.8 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Mac Jones and Matthew Stafford average in 2025?

Mac Jones averaged 11.8 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 11 games in 2025. Matthew Stafford averaged 20.6 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 8.8 points per game.

When are Mac Jones and Matthew Stafford's bye weeks in 2026?

Mac Jones (SF) has a bye in Week 14, and Matthew Stafford (LAR) has a bye in Week 8. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Mac Jones or Matthew Stafford a better fantasy quarterback in 2026?

Matthew Stafford outscored Mac Jones by 8.8 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.

Fantasy Managers Also Compared

Similar matchups other managers are researching right now.