DraftCall
DraftCallFantasy Football

Head to Head

Updated May 14, 2026 from live stats

Justin Fields vs Matthew Stafford

Fantasy Football Comparison for the 2026 NFL Season

The Bottom Line

Matthew Stafford is the better fantasy play this season.

Matthew Stafford is the better play on a neutral week. 20.6 PPG with 4,708 yards gives a reliable baseline. Justin Fields at 15.9 PPG is not far behind and could win specific weeks where matchup and game script align. Draft Matthew Stafford higher, but do not fade Justin Fields entirely.

Moderate confidence: stats favor the leader, but matchup variance could flip this weekly.

Want this verdict updated live on Sunday?

The DraftCall app pushes alerts the moment Justin Fields or Matthew Stafford's status changes. Free.

Get the App
QBNew York Jets#20
Justin Fields
PPG
15.9
Games
9
Pass Yds
1,259
Pass TDs
7
Rush Yds
383
Rush TDs
4
Bye
Week 9
QBLos Angeles Rams#3PPG LEADER
Matthew Stafford
PPG
20.6
Games
17
Pass Yds
4,707
Pass TDs
46
Bye
Week 8

The Edge Chart

VolumeEfficiencyTD UpsideFloorCeilingDurability
Justin Fields
Matthew Stafford

Head to Head

15.9 PPG20.6 PPG
9 GP17 GP
Bye: Week 9Bye: Week 8

Fantasy Tiers

Justin Fields: Tier 3 (Flex/Starter) QB (ranked #20 at the position). Matthew Stafford: Tier 1 (Elite) QB (ranked #3 at the position). Among the top 32 quarterbacks this season, Justin Fields is producing at 72% of elite pace and Matthew Stafford at 94%. That ranking gap means Matthew Stafford carries more trade value and a higher draft cost in 2026.

Justin Fields vs Matthew Stafford: Who Should You Start?

If you are choosing between Justin Fields and Matthew Stafford for your lineup, you are not alone. Justin Fields finished the 2025 season at 15.9 PPG for the New York Jets (9 games), and Matthew Stafford averaged 20.6 for the Los Angeles Rams (17 games).

That 4.7-point weekly advantage for Matthew Stafford is meaningful but not automatic. Fantasy football is a week-to-week sport, and the answer to "who should I start" often changes based on opponent, recent form, and game environment. Season averages set the baseline; weekly context makes the call.

Both lean on arm talent and offensive scheme as traditional pocket passers. Justin Fields threw for 1259 yards and 7 touchdowns, while Matthew Stafford posted 4707 yards and 46 scores. Volume, red zone efficiency, and game script are the key week-to-week differentiators when neither carries rushing upside.

Justin Fields has his bye in Week 9, and Matthew Stafford rests in Week 8. Managers rostering both need waiver wire depth at quarterback for those two weeks, and that is exactly the kind of planning DraftCall's matchup engine surfaces automatically so you are not scrambling on a Sunday morning.

Trade Value + Dynasty Outlook

Matthew Stafford is a buy in trades where the other manager is chasing upside at a different position. Justin Fields is a hold unless you can flip him for a positional upgrade elsewhere on your roster. Dynasty outlook: Justin Fields (age 27) is in his prime window. Peak production now with steady value for the next 3-4 seasons. Matthew Stafford (age 38) is on the back end of his prime. Strong now, but dynasty value declines year over year.

Did You Know?

  • Matthew Stafford outscored Justin Fields by a projected 80 total fantasy points over a full 17-game season.
  • Matthew Stafford played 17 games in 2025 compared to Justin Fields's 9. That durability gap means Matthew Stafford contributed more total fantasy points even before you look at per-game averages.
  • Matthew Stafford scored 46 total touchdowns in 2025 (2.7 per game), making him one of the more reliable scoring options at quarterback.
  • Justin Fields added 383 rushing yards in 2025, which historically correlates with a higher fantasy floor in bad passing matchups.
  • Justin Fields is 11 years younger than Matthew Stafford (27 vs 38), which significantly impacts dynasty league trade value.
Detailed Stat Breakdown
StatFieldsStafford
PPG (Half-PPR)15.920.6
Games Played917
Total Fantasy Pts (est.)143350
Passing Yards1,2594,707
Passing TDs746
Pass Yds/Game139.9276.9
Rushing Yards3831
Rushing TDs40
Total TDs1146
TDs/Game1.22.7
Age2738
Experience4 yrs16 yrs
Bye WeekWeek 9Week 8

Summary

The 2025 numbers favor Matthew Stafford at 20.6 PPG, 4.7 points per game above Justin Fields's 15.9. But season stats only tell part of the story. DraftCall's AI factors in weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status to give you a verdict that updates with the latest data.

DraftCall app on iPhone

Website vs App

Get the AI verdict on Justin Fields vs Matthew Stafford

DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality, recent trends, injury impact, and game script to give you a clear start/sit recommendation.

See everything in the app →

Frequently Asked Questions

Should I start Justin Fields or Matthew Stafford in fantasy football?

Based on 2025 season averages, Matthew Stafford has the edge at 20.6 PPG compared to Justin Fields's 15.9 PPG. However, the best start depends on weekly matchup, recent form, and injury status. DraftCall's app provides real-time AI-powered verdicts that factor in all of these variables.

How many fantasy points did Justin Fields and Matthew Stafford average in 2025?

Justin Fields averaged 15.9 fantasy points per game (half-PPR) across 9 games in 2025. Matthew Stafford averaged 20.6 PPG over 17 games. That is a difference of 4.7 points per game.

When are Justin Fields and Matthew Stafford's bye weeks in 2026?

Justin Fields (NYJ) has a bye in Week 9, and Matthew Stafford (LAR) has a bye in Week 8. Plan your roster accordingly if you are carrying both players.

Is Justin Fields or Matthew Stafford a better fantasy quarterback in 2026?

Matthew Stafford outscored Justin Fields by 4.7 PPG in 2025, which gives him the edge heading into 2026. For a week-by-week verdict, DraftCall's AI analyzes matchup quality and recent trends in real time.